Walking the tightrope: women cardiologists in an old boys’ club

by Carolyn Thomas     @HeartSisters   

You know there’s trouble in paradise when the Women In Cardiology Leadership Council reports that their group (part of the American College of Cardiology) is “very frustrated and concerned about the lack of growth in the numbers of women pursuing a career in cardiology.”(1)  Although women represent over half of medical students, just 10-15 per cent of practicing cardiologists, and 4 per cent of interventional cardiologists (the ones who implanted your stent in the cath lab) are women.

Dr. Celina Yong, one of those rare female interventional cardiologists out there, teaches cardiovascular medicine at Stanford University. She believes that “a gender-lopsided field can affect patient care.”

Cardiologist Dr. Sharonne Hayes,  founder of the Mayo Women’s Heart Clinic, described female cardiologists as “walking a tightrope”, which she explained to mean“too feminine to be competent vs. too masculine to be likeable”. In a webinar called Effecting Change: Professionalism, Bias & Burnout”, presented by the American College of Cardiology’s Women in Cardiology Section, she and her cardiologist colleagues Dr. Jennifer Mieres, and Dr. Laxmi Mehta spoke out on the topics of professionalism, biases, and preventing burnout.

High status jobs, Dr. Hayes noted (like being a cardiologist, for example) are often seen as requiring ‘masculine’ qualities (e.g. calm, decisive, confident) as opposed to ‘feminine’ qualities (e.g. modest, communal, self-effacing) – adding that racial and minority groups are especially affected by this expectation.

    “We are dealing with others’ cultural expectations of what and how a woman should ‘be’ and ‘act’ while getting one’s work done.”

The deep roots of gender bias in medicine have been a challenge for a long time everywhere. In their Canadian Journal of Cardiology commentary called The Girls in the Boys’ Club, Drs. Michelle Graham and Catherine Kells (both interventional cardiologists) reflected on their own early career experiences.(8)

As Dr. Kells explained:

”    In 1984, it was so rare to have a woman choose cardiology that no one really had any advice to give me. So, I blindly started my training with little to no idea how difficult it would be to balance a career in cardiology with a family life as a wife and mother. The obstacles came in strange places and sometimes from unexpected sources. Nurses, patients, friends, family and colleagues would occasionally make comments like, ‘Women should not be in the cath lab’ or ‘When you have children, you will give up all this nonsense’. My particular favourite was, ‘You marry a wife; you call a doctor’ .

Dr. Graham, arriving in the profession 10 years later than Dr. Kell, added her own story: 

    “By the 1990s, a decade later, we had made progress in cardiology,  but my experiences unfortunately highlight ongoing issues. When I was an internal medicine resident, most of the attending physicians told me, ‘Don’t do it, you won’t have a job’.  To make matters worse, many of my friends said, ‘Don’t do it, you’ll never meet anyone, get married, have a family, have a life …’  

“This specialty really was a ‘boys’ club’. By 1996, I was still the only female in my cardiology residency program in the three years I was there. One of the male interventionalists told me that ‘women don’t belong in the cath lab’. However, I think that things would have been much harder for me had I not had the unique mentorship of my program director, Dr. Catherine Kells, to show me that women can have both a successful career in cardiology and a family – but not without pain and effort.”

That’s the historical background from yesterday behind what Dr. Sharonne Hayes is describing about women in cardiology today.

Dr. Hayes acknowledged that, while there’s a lot of self-help advice out there to assist women in coping with pervasive discrimination, the system is broken, and we need to stop ‘fixing’ women”.

She also talked about what she calls the stereotype identity threat that most female cardiologists have personally experienced on some level.

When you’re aware of a negative stereotype about your group, she explained, your attention is split between the activity at hand and your concerns about being seen stereotypically “which can divert your cognitive resources  – the skills that would otherwise be used to help maximize your performance.”

(By the way, I’ve observed that my own cognitive resources evaporate whenever I have tried to squeeze my car into a tight parking spot if a bunch of (male) construction workers happen to be standing nearby watching. Even an experienced parallel parker like me can be reduced to giving up in a sweaty heap before abandoning a perfectly good parking spot in order to avoid critical stares and mocking comments).

Dr. Hayes shared this example of how a stereotype identify threat can work to derail abilities:

         “I m getting up in front of the boardroom to do a presentation on women’s heart disease or diversity and inclusion in the workplace. I’m the expert in the room, but I walk into a room filled with white grey-haired male leaders, and I feelde-skilled”. I am ready, I practiced this – but suddenly I cannot find my words!” 

She adds that a similar reaction is common among other negative stereotype identity scenarios, an example being the short kid on the basketball team.

Watch the ACC webinar for more fascinating facts about this dilemma, and also some useful tips for women already working as cardiologists on how to stop feeling like that short kid on the basketball team. . . 


1. Lundberg, Gina et al. “Addressing Gender Equity in Cardiology”, American Journal of Medicine, Commentary, 2020 Elsevier Inc. doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.016

2. Mehta LS et al.  “Current Demographic Status of Cardiologists in the United States”. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):1029-1033. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3247.

3. Maxwell, Y. “Discrimination Still Runs Rampant for Women in Cardiology”. TCTMD, April 2, 2016.

4. Celina M. Yong et al.  “Sex Differences in the Pursuit of Interventional Cardiology as a Subspecialty Among Cardiovascular Fellows-in-Training”. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 12 (3) 219–228

5. Greenwood, Brad N et al. Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115.34 (2018): 8569-8574.

6. The free webinar,“Effecting Change: Professionalism, Bias & Burnout”, presented by the American College of Cardiology’s Women in Cardiology Section. Speakers included cardiologists Dr. Sharonne Hayes, Dr. Jennifer Mieres, and Dr. Laxmi Mehta on the topics of professionalism, biases, and preventing burnout. October 29, 2020

7. Julia A. Files et al. “Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias”, Journal of Women’s Health. http://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6044 Volume: 26 Issue 5: May 1, 2017. 413-419

8. MM Graham, CM Kells. “The Girls in the Boys’ Club: Reflections from Canadian Women in Cardiology.” Can J Cardiol 2005;21(13):1163-1164.

Q:   How can cardiology be more welcoming to women in the profession? 

.

NOTE FROM CAROLYN:  I wrote about the cardiology gender gap (but from a patient’s perspective) in my book, A Woman’s Guide to Living with Heart Disease , published by Johns Hopkins University Press in 2017.  You can ask for it at your local library or favourite bookshop, or order it online (paperback, hardcover or e-book) at Amazon, or order it directly from my publisher (use their code HTWN to save 30% off the list price).

See also:

Women in Cardiology: “Underrepresented, Underestimated, and Undervalued“:  (Four papers in the journal JAMA Cardiology tackle the issues affecting women who are thinking about joining or who have already joined the male-dominated field); article published in TCTMD.

A list of several Heart Sisters articles about gender bias in medicine

 

 

Two kinds of heart patients, and the third kind that aren’t patients – yet!

by Carolyn Thomas       @HeartSisters

The shocking American Heart Association National Survey results released in September reported that women’s awareness of heart disease has actually declined during the past decade. As my regular readers already know, I felt sick when I read this. Barely half of the women surveyed, for example, could recognize “chest pain” as a possible sign of heart attack. It took a wee lie-down before I was able to re-evaluate my own awareness-raising efforts here on Heart Sisters.  At first blush, it appeared to me that I’m aiming to reach two specific kinds of women.    .     .  Continue reading “Two kinds of heart patients, and the third kind that aren’t patients – yet!”

“Don’t lift anything heavier than a fork”: really bad advice after heart surgery

by Carolyn Thomas       @HeartSisters

Almost 200 years ago, newspapers reported on the outcome of a surgical amputation performed in London by Robert Liston (apparently known as the “fastest knife in the West End” – because speed was important in pre-anaesthesia 1829). Here’s how this was described:

“The operation was successful, but the patient died.”

We don’t know much about the unfortunate patient who went under the knife that day (thus making that ironic description famous in medical circles). But fast forward through the centuries to a duo of modern researchers who wondered why some patients who are undergoing successful cardiac surgery end up having poor outcomes, too.       .                 

Continue reading ““Don’t lift anything heavier than a fork”: really bad advice after heart surgery”

How long does it take to heal from open heart surgery?

by Carolyn Thomas       @HeartSisters

Unless they’re undergoing minimally-invasive cardiac surgery, most heart patients facing open heart surgery may in fact hear a range of responses to “how long will it take?” because of the added complexity of getting their sternum (or breastbone, the long flat bone in the centre of the chest) cracked open right down the middle. 

This procedure is called a sternotomy.  As you can imagine, a cracked-open bone takes longer to heal afterwards than a simple soft tissue incision does.

But how long?  Cleveland Clinic cardiologists suggest this:

“You’ll do most of your healing – about 80 per cent – in the first 6-8 weeks after surgery”. Complete recovery can take about one full year.”

But when University of Toronto cardiac surgeon Dr. Bobby Yanagawa pondered the same question online recently, he received a surprisingly wide range of answers from other physicians in response to this post on Twitter (10/8/2020):

“As cardiac surgeons who see patients at a 6-week follow-up appointment, we don’t really have a good sense of how long it takes to recover from a sternotomy.

“I used to say three months, but now I say 3-6 months. I suspect a survey of patients will reveal that it takes much longer for complete recovery.

“Is a survey needed?”

Here’s just a sampling of dozens of responses from cardiac surgeons and other docs to Dr. Yanagawa’s Tweet:

7. “Maybe the definition of ‘recover’ varies. Patient expectations: pain-free, baseline function. Doctor expectations: good healing, improving function. Since people will heal variously, might be good to align expectations e.g. “At three months, we hope to see _____”

8. “Some bypass surgery patients complain of pump head (dizziness and fatigue) up to 10 weeks post-op. I agree we need a survey to see what’s going on with them.”

9. “It will also depend on the care provided after hospital discharge. If the patients are sent home straight after surgery, the recovery seems to take forever. If they go to recovery centres with physiotherapy, dietitians and an overall holistic recovery approach, then recovery is shorter!”

10. “There are so many variables in recovery after cardiac surgery. Cardiac rehabilitation enhances recovery. It’s imperative to get people moving and back to their baseline as soon as possible.” 

And even some responses from cardiac surgery patients themselves:

11.  “I had a mini-sternotomy with wires at age 52, and while I had minimal pain afterwards, I had complications at six months (pleural and pericardial effusion). I didn’t feel close to ‘normal’ for a solid year, then two years before I felt like myself. Depressing when they tell you it will take 6-8 weeks!”

12.  “I am nine months post-op; from the get-go I have been dealing with clicking, instability and pain. I found out it was a sternal non-union (a persistent fracture of the sternum after three months without signs of healing). “Now trying physiotherapy in hopes to avoid another sternotomy.  Long story short: yeah, I’d say it takes longer than three months to recover.”  NOTE: read more about how non-invasive pulsed ultrasound therapy has been successfully used in the U.K. to treat sternal non-union).

And these two comments from the When-Doctors-Become-Patients world, in which doctors have open heart surgery:

13.  “I followed up on a surgical colleague post-op – shocked at how long and difficult the recovery was.”

14.  “I’m an interventional cardiologist who needed a sternotomy at a young age. After three months, I felt ‘okay’ enough to work.  But just barely. I couldn’t imagine true physical labor at that point.”

This small one-day snapshot of varying responses to a sternotomy healing question (with answers essentially ranging from six weeks to one year) may seem puzzling to some patients.

That’s an impossibly wide range of possibly correct answers.

And few if any of the answers even mentioned the psychosocial recuperation impact of being diagnosed with a heart condition serious enough to require profoundly invasive cardiac surgery.  See also:  When Are Cardiologists Going to Start Talking About Depression?

Given this reality, I commend Dr. Yanagawa’s open call for feedback, acknowledging that his own post-op advice to patients has dramatically changed from three months to now 3-6 months – and additionally suggesting a survey of patients.

But instead of asking other cardiac surgeons what they’re telling patients, how about instead asking patients what their lived experience has been like? 

As the University of Calgary’s Dr. Doreen Rabi answered that tweet:

It is so important to include patients in defining what ‘recovery’ really means. I have heard repeatedly when I speak with patients that they ‘don’t trust’ their body for two years after a cardiac event/surgery. Anecdotal for sure, but compellingly consistent.”

Last year, a systematic review of studies on patient-centred adult cardiac surgery recovery published in the Journal of the American Heart Association reported, in a remarkably under-stated conclusion, that “the evidence base for post-operative patient‐reported outcome measures needs to be strengthened.”(1)   TRANSLATION: The studies they found were small, mostly done in single centres, 71 per cent male and 88 per cent white.

So in answer to the original question: “Is a survey needed?”, we might be tempted to say, What took you so long?

The promising news is that such surveys do exist, and some heart patients themselves have already been asked.

In 2016, for example, Dr. Sari Holmes and her team at the University of Maryland in Baltimore published a study using a heart patient survey called C-SPEQ –“Cardiac Surgery Patient Expectations Questionnaire”.(2) Although prediction of poor outcomes or longer recovery time after open heart surgery is most often focused on physical and surgical factors, these researchers suggested that the wide variation in these predictions may also be affected by psychosocial aspects that are not typically even considered by cardiologists.

In this study, the higher the patients’ pre-surgery C-SPEQ survey scores, the greater their rate of depression and perceived stress, and the longer their recovery time.

The study’s conclusion:

“Negative pre-surgery expectations have a detrimental impact on both recovery and quality of life following that surgery. Pre-surgical education might better prepare patients, reduce negative expectations, and improve psychosocial outcomes after cardiac surgery.”

What else might help speed up sternotomy recovery?

♥  Cardiac rehabilitation for almost all heart patients is recommended in current practice guidelines of all cardiovascular societies worldwide as a Class I recommendation (which means that a procedure/treatment should be performed/administered). Studies have shown that completing a course of rehab classes can significantly lower your cardiac risk. Most cardiac rehab programs this year have had to move online due to COVID-19.  Ask your cardiologist about participating in a virtual rehab program like this series of exercises developed by Vancouver Coastal Health for their heart patients.

Keep Your Move In The Tubeis a recovery concept developed by a Texas-based team of physical therapists, occupational therapists and cardiac rehabilitation specialists to help prevent sternal wound complications.(3) They claim that the common “Don’t lift more than 5 pounds” hospital post-op warning to new heart surgery patients is the opposite of what they need to hear. Instead, this team teaches recovering hospital patients to safely move or lift (e.g. getting out of bed) that involves keeping elbows tucked into the sides (as if inside an imaginary “tube”) while lifting, pushing or pulling – with the goal of faster recovery. This concept is also expanding to other hospitals (including in Alberta, Canada).

♥  What you can do ahead of time:  You may assume that your recovery will start as soon as you’re safely out of surgery. But a key predictor of speedy healing is often how healthy you are before that day. So if your surgery is scheduled (i.e. not an emergency procedure), you  may have some time between now and your surgery date to work on issues like smoking or other steps you can take to become as healthy as possible.

And for cardiac surgeons who, like Dr. Yanagawa, are wondering how to answer that “how long does it take?” question from patients, consider surgeon Dr. Lisa Brown’s suggestion. Here’s how this researcher and Assistant Professor of Thoracic Surgery at the University of California-Davis responded to Dr. Yanagawa’s original Tweet:

“Start collecting patient-reported outcomes!”

Why didn’t somebody think of that?

Ask the patient. What a concept!

 

 

 

  1. Makoto Mori et al. “Characterizing Patient‐Centered Postoperative Recovery After Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review” Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;816 Oct 2019
  2. Holmes SD et al. “Development of the Cardiac Surgery Patient Expectations Questionnaire (C-SPEQ).” Qual Life Res. 2016 Aug;25(8):2077-86. 
  3. Adams J et al. “An alternative approach to prescribing sternal precautions after median sternotomy, “Keep Your Move in the Tube”. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2016;29(1):97-100. doi:10.1080/08998280.2016.11929379

See also:

– Recuperation and a red leather chair

Learning to love your open heart surgery scar

Convalescence: the forgotten phase of illness recovery

Learning to live with heart disease: the fourth stage of heart attack recovery