Are you a ‘health seeker’ or a ‘disease seeker’?

by Carolyn Thomas  @HeartSisters

I recently wrote about a woman who has few if any cardiac symptoms, no definitive test results, and very little if any reason to believe she might have a heart condition. Yet she is so utterly convinced of her extreme risk for having a heart attack that she actually describes feeling like a “ticking time bomb”.

Her conviction may have something to do with the increasing media coverage of atypical signs of heart disease in women (= a good thing).  Or it may have something to do with the possibility that she is “catastrophizing” by looking to snag an attention-getting heart disease diagnosis (= a bad thing).

I’ve recently subscribed to medical historian Dr. Jan Henderson‘s fascinating blog called The Health Culture, and that’s where I was once again reminded of a book that may actually help to inform this woman’s case.

It’s called Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health by Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, who’s a professor of medicine at Dartmouth Medical School and author of another provocatively-titled book, Should I Be Tested For Cancer? Maybe Not and Here’s Why.

Jan offers this simplistic overview of Dr. Welch’s new book:

“We choose to pursue health or to pursue disease.”

For example, she describes Dr. Welch’s take on the wide spectrum of our attitudes toward our own health.

“At one end are those who regard medical care as something to be used when symptoms arise, but not when feeling healthy. One could characterize these people as wanting to stay healthy and well.

“At the other end are those who seek to identify and treat potential problems that they’re currently not aware of. The focus for this group is not health so much as staying alive – doing everything possible to avoid disease and death.”

In his new book, Dr. Welch suggests that overdiagnosis can occur when we seek diagnoses in the absence of any real symptoms. He compares disease seekers with health seekers in this way: (emphasis added)

“I am not suggesting all diseases are curable after symptoms appear, nor am I suggesting that no diagnoses should be made in the absence of symptoms. I’m simply suggesting that we should be most cautious about early diagnosis in those who feel well.

“Some people may prefer to pursue health: to focus on feeling healthy and minimize medical contact while they are well. They may accept a slightly higher chance of death or disability to minimize the chance of medicalization, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment now. They prefer to reserve medical care for problems that are obvious to them.

“Others may want to pursue disease: do everything they possibly can to be healthy in the future and to decrease their chances of experiencing death or disability – even with the knowledge that they are more likely to be diagnosed with disease, more likely to be frequently exposed to medical care, and more likely to suffer harm.

“They prefer to work to avoid death and choose to allow medical care to assume a larger role in their lives. Many view this as the best strategy to stay well. But it is difficult to promote wellness when actively looking for things to be wrong.

“In the effort to find out that everything is okay, people pursue early diagnosis. Ironically, this strategy increases the chances that they’ll be told something is wrong.”

These words made sense to me, and it’s not just because of that woman convinced that her heart attack is imminent – behaviour that’s known as “cardiophobia”.  This is an anxiety disorder characterized by repeated complaints of chest pain, heart palpitations, and other somatic sensations accompanied by fears of having a heart attack and of dying.

Amid limited health care resources, overburdened medical staff and long waiting lists, I believe that there are also more sinister issues at work with “disease-seeking” behaviours. As I wrote here in January:

“Those who insist on wasting limited medical resources in search of a high-drama cardiac diagnosis that will never come make it so much harder for those of us who actually are ill to be taken seriously by the medical profession.

“Instead, genuinely ill people with real symptoms are then lumped in with the cardiophobes of the world, dismissed and sent home in mid-heart attack, as I and many other female heart attack survivors have experienced.  

“This is an extremely serious issue. We know that female heart patients are under-diagnosed (and then under-treated even when appropriately diagnosed) compared to men. Women under the age of 55, in fact, are seven times more likely than men to be misdiagnosed even in mid-heart attack.

“One wonders how many catastrophizing cardiophobes my exhausted and burned out E.R. doctor encountered before I arrived at his door, and before he sent me home in mid-heart attack with an acid reflux misdiagnosis – just another hysterical middle-aged hypochondriac?”

Dr. Welch, along with his co-authors Dr. Lisa Schwartz and Dr. Steven Woloshin, had already written in the New York Times* a couple years ago that what’s actually making us sick is what they call “an epidemic of diagnoses”. For example:

“This epidemic is a threat to your health. It has two distinct sources.

“One is the medicalization of everyday life. Most of us experience physical or emotional sensations we don’t like, and in the past, this was considered a part of life.

“Increasingly, however, such sensations are now considered symptoms of disease.  Everyday experiences like insomnia, sadness, twitchy legs and impaired sex drive now become diagnoses: sleep disorder, depression, restless legs syndrome and sexual dysfunction.  While these diagnoses may benefit the few with severe symptoms, one has to wonder about the effect on the many whose symptoms are mild, intermittent or transient.

“The other source is the drive to find disease early. While diagnoses used to be reserved for serious illness, we now diagnose illness in people who have no symptoms at all, those with so-called pre-disease or those “at risk.”

* “What’s Making Us Sick Is an Epidemic of Diagnoses” – New York Times, January 2, 2007

See also:


9 thoughts on “Are you a ‘health seeker’ or a ‘disease seeker’?

  1. I agree with the message about seeking too much medical care except about implying that those with real symptoms and afraid something is wrong are portrayed as drama-seeking or wanting to snag an “attention getting diagnosis”. That’s pretty offensive actually!

    There is another disorder for that – Münchausen syndrome. However, those who suffer from panic attacks, phobias or other general anxiety really do feel symptoms and most likely they are worried about falling through the cracks in the system or that a doctor is going to misdiagnose them as having anxiety. Yes it’s easy to keep going back to press the doctor to “look deeper” or “run another test” but if you suffer from anxiety, have heart related symptoms, and have read just ONE story about a woman who was given the brush off, you are going to think it could happen to you.

    So you can’t stop thinking about the symptoms until you get checked out by a doctor, maybe multiple times. But not because you want attention… you just don’t want to die.


    1. Thanks for your comment, Emily. Read Jan Henderson’s article (quoted above) for a broader perspective on what I’m writing here.

      I agree with your assessment that some people living with panic or anxiety disorders can indeed convince themselves that their symptoms are sure signs of imminent heart attack and/or death. The outcome of such conviction is seeking emergency medical help “multiple times”. There is simply no amount of “run another test” that can satisfy or reassure them. And that is simply unfair to those suffering from real cardiac emergencies whose care is undoubtedly jeopardized or delayed by a healthcare system exhausted by demanding catastrophizers, nor does it make those demands justifiable. I don’t know what the solution is, but this reality needs to be acknowledged. Münchausen syndrome is also a severe mental health issue, and whether unwarranted medical care is offered to those with or without perceived symptoms, the threat to our health care system remains the same.

      My elderly neighbour, for example, spent most of his waking life convinced he was suffering from some type of catastrophic illness, despite his doctor’s ongoing attempts to reassure him that he was perfectly healthy (which he was). Finally, one day he appeared at our house for dinner, pointing to a tiny mole on his forehead. “It’s CANCER!” he cried with absolute delight. He felt finally vindicated, after decades of complaining and insisting that every bubble or squeak was a deadly diagnosis, and decades of wasting precious medical resources while demanding “too much medical care”, as you say.


  2. THANK-YOU for this. I belong to an amateur theatre group. I’ve become more and more alarmed by the direction our members’ casual conversations seem to be heading. It’s all about this medical test or that medical procedure or some new ache or pain or twinge that they’re going to see their doctors to have checked out immediately. Nothing is too minor to demand expensive follow-up tests for. Are their whole lives devoted to this new focus on failing health? I can’t stand it!! I’m printing off this article and passing it around at our next rehearsal.


  3. Ouch. After reading this, I’m pretty sure I’m one of those “disease seekers”. You are so right, it is a form of anxiety, because nothing makes a person more anxious than worrying something might be very wrong.


  4. Carolyn,
    This ties in perfectly with your article from the other day about rumination and also with the findings from a recent study out of London.

    Researchers saw a direct correlation between obsessive worry about cardiac conditions and severity of a cardiac attack.


    1. Thanks for your comment, Jen – I’m familiar with this U.K. study (mostly on how the fear of dying can affect post-heart attack outcomes). What surprised me was this observation from the study authors: “We found that fear of dying is quite common among patients suffering a heart attack; it was experienced by one in five patients.”

      One in five patients? ONLY ONE IN FIVE? These folks must have had far different heart attacks than I experienced…


      1. lol! Oh sista! Ms. Thomas where can we find your Stumbleupon handle? Would love to see what you are reading…Thank you ever so much and have a blessed day!


        1. I’m not Stumbling. Just busy flitting from one fascinating resource to the next. I call this ‘cardiac rehab for my brain’ . . . 😉


Your opinion matters. What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s