Me: “My name is Carolyn, and I’m a Medical Googler.”
You, all together now: “Hello, Carolyn!”
This will come as no surprise to any of you regular readers, but I’m just a wee bit obsessed about All Things Cardiac. From the very minute I was sent home from hospital after surviving a heart attack, I started mainlining Google like it was a drug. I became hooked. I threw myself into researching women’s heart disease in a determined attempt to figure out what the heck had just hit me. And after I had the opportunity to spend five days at Mayo Clinic in October, I became truly insufferable.
Google is how I happened to learn about the annual WomenHeart Science & Leadership Symposium for Women with Heart Disease at Mayo Clinic last fall: I found it on Google.
Google is how I found about 7,000 other heart sisters – all survivors like me – on the WomenHeart National Coalition for Women With Heart Disease.online support community. I found them on Google.
That’s how I began subscribing to regular cardiology news bulletins from medical journals, clinical research sites, and university heart institutes. I found them all on Google.
And that is also how I came to inform my cardiologist recently during my regular follow-up visit that doctors should stop prescribing the drugs Plavix and Wellbutrin together anymore, because – yes! – I’d found the FDA Drug Alert on Google.
But he told me that he had not yet heard about this alert – one full week after the warning had been issued. Since depression is a surprisingly common companion of heart disease in women (Mayo Clinic cardiologists told us that up to 65% of survivors experience depression, yet fewer than 10% are appropriately diagnosed), many survivors have been prescribed both the anti-platelet drug Plavix and the antidepressant Wellbutrin.
If you’re one of them, it likely means your doctor hasn’t visited Dr. Google recently to learn of the contraindication.
I am, apparently, a doctor’s worse nightmare now.
Dr. Stuart Foxman of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario implied as much in his blog for physicians called DocTalk. He wrote about the growing phenomenon of patients who are now self-educated Medical Googlers. One study found that many physicians rate the know-it-all Googler as somewhere between “frustrating” and “irritating”.
The study noted a number of doctors’ concerns. Some patients used the information gleaned on their own for self-diagnosis or self-treatment. Some doctors believed that the information caused the patient unnecessary confusion and distress. “All of these seem like legitimate concerns on the part of physicians,” explains Dr. Foxman.
But he notes that the doctors surveyed in this study expressed other concerns, too.
“The highly curious and informed patients were sometimes perceived as ‘challenging’ with a tendency to test the knowledge of physicians.
“Some doctors felt that these patients were ‘overly assertive, undermined their authority, and did not show sufficient trust’ in their health care provider.”
Dr. Scott Haig‘s TIME magazine essay called ‘When The Patient Is A Googler’ is a scathingly arrogant attack, describing his Googling patients as “suspicious and distrustful, their pressured sentences bursting with misused, mispronounced words and half-baked ideas.”
Just a tad oversensitive to having his authority undermined, perhaps?
Dr. Haig writes:
“Some patients don’t want to know what’s wrong with them, what medicines they’re taking, or even what kind of operation you’re planning to do on them. ‘Just get me better, Doc,’ is all they say.”
Now there’s a nice compliant, well-behaved kind of patient who would never even dream of undermining Dr. Haig’s authority by trying to learn about their own medical condition – and then coming up with any of those pesky “half-baked ideas”.
EARTH TO DR. HAIG and others of your ilk: if enough of us continue to have our cardiac symptoms dismissed or minimized or - worse! – misdiagnosed (as I did when that first ER doc told me I was just having acid reflux instead of a heart attack), then you can expect more and more of your patients to start doing their own Googling research in an effort to educate themselves as much as possible about what is happening to their own bodies.
The clear reality is that both the volume of medical, health and wellness material that is readily available out there (and the number of people who regularly access it) are increasing, whether people like Dr. Haig likes it or not.
The website WebMD alone gets over 40 million visits every month. According to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, 80% of us use the internet to “prepare for or recover from” our doctor visits. And a reported two-thirds of patients apparently want their doctors to recommend reliable website resources for them.
Dr. Foxman adds that there are, of course, ‘cyberchondriacs‘ who believe that whatever condition they’ve read about on the internet must be the horrible ailment they have. And the amount of sheer unadulterated trash online is mind-boggling. That’s why Dr. Foxman recommends reputable patient resource sites like the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Medical Googling is not only for those patients who want to sincerely learn and ask questions about their own health, but online searches can also be a diagnostic tool for physicians.
Australian researchers reported in the British Medical Journal on their study that chose 3-5 search terms for hard-to-diagnose illnesses, and then looked at how Google did compared with reports published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The study found that doctors who use Google to help diagnose difficult cases can find a correct diagnosis over 60% of the time.
How I wish that the first ER doc who sent me home in mid-heart attack with an acid reflux misdiagnosis had instead tried Googling my symptoms (central chest pain, nausea, sweating and pain radiating down my left arm). I’m now fairly confident that Dr. Google would have steered him to the correct diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
The British Medical Journal also notes that doctors have been estimated to carry an astonishing two million facts in their heads to help them diagnose illness – but Google gives them quick access to more than three billion medical articles.
Who can keep up with three billion medical articles?
I like to think that I was really just helping out my wonderful cardiologist by passing on to him what I’d Googled about that FDA Drug Alert.
And for dependably reliable information about women and heart disease, visit the websites The Heart Truth or WomenHeart: The National Coalition For Women With Heart Disease or Mayo Clinic.
Thanks also to Kevin McCarthy, who recently reminded me of the comprehensive site called Up To Date, which offers evidence-based general medical information for both patients and clinicians (by subscription); this independent site (unlike some others run by those with the letters M.D. after their names) accepts no advertising or industry revenue.
- Health Information Online: How to Tell the Trash from the Truth
- Reliable Health Info from the Medically Unqualified
- A Second Opinion From Dr. Google
- Why You’ll Listen to Me – But Not to Your Doctor
Q: Are you a Medical Googler, too?