What I wish I knew back then: “What happens to heart muscle during a heart attack?”

by Carolyn Thomas    ♥   @HeartSisters

Researchers tell us that women wait significantly longer than our male counterparts to seek medical help – yes, even in mid-heart attack!  In fact, trying to figure out WHY women wait dangerously longer than we should has become a unique field of cardiac study on what’s known as treatment-seeking delay behaviour.

“What I Wish I Knew Back Then”  is a back-to-basics summer series of posts here on Heart Sisters that will revisit some of the most frequently asked questions from new heart patients. Today, Part 2 continues with another basic that often accompanies a heart attack: “What happens to heart muscle if I wait too long to get urgent help?” 

First, a wee anatomy refresher:  cardiac muscle (also called myocardium) is one of three distinct types of muscle in our bodies, along with skeletal muscle (attached to our bones and, in some areas, our skin – like the muscles in our faces, for example) and smooth muscle (found in the walls of our hollow organs like the bladder, stomach, intestines, lungs, etc).

Cardiac muscle makes up the thick middle layer of the heart, in charge of pumping blood out and then relaxing to let blood back in. This amazing muscle is known as the hardest-working in the human body.

I like how Dr. Sian Harding – a cardiac researcher, professor of medicine and author of the fascinating book called The Exquisite Machine  – describes the heart’s pumping role:

“The heartbeat needs to squeeze out blood strongly enough to circulate around the whole body, so the heart muscle must generate strong and rapid force. However, it’s also very important for the heart to relax quickly in between beats; otherwise, there is not enough time for it to fill with blood before the next beat. The faster it can do this, the more efficient the beat.”

Here’s why it’s so important to call 911 immediately if you think you might be having a heart attack. A heart attack (or myocardial infarction) is the result of heart muscle cells dying due to something blocking the flow of oxygenated blood supply to that muscle. This blockage is most often due to a buildup of plaque in coronary arteries (a process called atherosclerosis).  Plaque is made up of fatty particles, cholesterol, cellular waste products and other yuck that can take years to build up. But if a plaque ruptures, a blood clot can quickly form inside the artery – which may cause a heart attack. In about 5 per cent of heart attacks, blood flow to the heart muscle can be blocked not by a blood clot, but by a spasm in a coronary artery.

So if this oxygenated blood supply to the heart muscle is severely blocked, irreversible damage may begin within minutes. This damage means that the heart muscle affected by a lack of blood flow can no longer work as it should – and permanent scar tissue can begin to form. Depending on the location of the blocked coronary artery and how much heart muscle is deprived of oxygenated blood flow downstream from that blockage, disability, sudden cardiac arrest, or death can result.

Unlike skeletal muscles of the body (which can often repair themselves after an injury), the heart can’t quite promise that same result. If you pull your calf muscle, for example, it will slowly begin to heal itself within a few days. The heart may have some ability to heal itself, but this regeneration can’t typically fix the kind of heart muscle damage caused by a heart attack, as Dr. Harding further explains:

“In someone aged 75, individual cardiac muscle cells would have been beating for 75 years continuously, more than two billion contraction/relaxation cycles. This is perfection on an almost unbelievable scale. There would be a tiny smidgeon of regeneration too (about half a per cent of these cells are renewed in one year). That’s just enough to cover you for cell loss due to general wear and tear, the daily grind of anxiety and effort, starvation and natural insults. But it is nowhere near enough for the train wreck of severe cardiac disease. The body’s defenses are completely overwhelmed by the massive destruction of a heart attack.”

Time equals muscle, as cardiologists like to say about that heart muscle.

Immediate medical intervention – ideally within the first hour following the onset of cardiac symptoms – is aimed at restoring adequate blood flow to that battered heart muscle to minimize damage. This intervention may include:

  • invasive procedures (opening up the blocked arteries with the help of a coronary stent or bypass graft surgery)
  • optimal medication management of the condition in lower-risk patients (e.g. beta blockers, calcium blockers, statins, aspirin therapy, and forms of nitroglycerin)
  • thrombolytic therapy (the use of medications to break up or dissolve blood clots in the case of either heart attack or stroke)

Again, no matter what the treatment recommendation of the cardiologist may be, the faster you are medically assessed and a treatment plan is put into place, the better. Researchers point to women’s treatment-seeking delay behaviour as one reason our cardiac outcomes tend to be more deadly than men’s. Women tend to wait too long to ask for help in the first place.

But here’s another reason:  women are significantly more likely to be misdiagnosed in mid-heart attack compared to our male counterparts. The European Society of Cardiology reported a 2021 study, for example, that found physicians are significantly more likely to consider heart disease as the cause of chest pain in men compared to women.(1)  This gender bias was maintained “regardless of the number of risk factors or the presence of typical cardiac chest pain in women. And women with cardiac symptoms were significantly more likely than men to present late to the hospital (defined as waiting 12 hours or longer after symptom onset).”

One of this study’s authors, Dr. Gemma Martinez-Nadal, added that physicians and women alike need to be far more aware of this implicit gender bias:

“The low suspicion of heart attack occurs in both women themselves and in physicians – leading to higher risks of late diagnosis and misdiagnosis.”

The key take-away message here: women cannot control the existing systemic bias in medicine, but we  do have control over our personal decision to seek immediate care for symptoms we believe are heart-related.

More details on those specific warning symptoms in Part 1 of this series: What I Wish I Knew Back Then:  Am I Having a Heart Attack?

Sources:  Dr. Sian Harding, Harvard University, European Society of Cardiology,  Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, British Heart Foundation, Heart & Stroke Foundation
Floral image: Debannja, Pixabay

© 2023 Carolyn Thomas  www.myheartsisters.org

1.  “Stress, Psycho-Social and Cultural Aspects of Heart Disease: Cardiovascular Disease in Women.” 12 March 2021. Acute CardioVascular Care 2021, European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Coming up next Sunday: “6 Reasons Women Delay Seeking Help During a Heart Attack”

.

NOTE FROM CAROLYN:  My book A Woman’s Guide to Living with Heart Disease“ reads like the“Best Of” Heart Sisters blog archives.  You can ask for it at your local library or bookstore (please support your favourite independent bookseller!) or order it online (paperback, hardcover or e-book) at Amazon – or order it directly from my publisher Johns Hopkins University Press (use their code HTWN to save 30% off the list price).

See also:

Women’s heart disease: an awareness campaign fail?

Knowing & Going’ – act fast when heart attack symptoms hit

Women fatally unaware of heart attack symptoms

Is it heartburn or heart attack?

What is causing my chest pain?

.

7 thoughts on “What I wish I knew back then: “What happens to heart muscle during a heart attack?”

  1. Hi Carolyn,
    I am part of that 5% but I never failed to see my doctor. I have bronchial asthma and thought when I stopped breathing, that my asthma was getting worse.

    My doctor would do a 12 lead EKG each time. The problem when all was said and done was that I have the raw form of coronary artery in which my main artery went into spasms and collapse, gave no sign on the EKG that my heart was in trouble. Then after 14 months of doctor visit came back clear, I suffered an AMI/ STEMI widowmaker with massive irreversible progressive damage and without angina pectoris (no chest pains). The spasms are in my main coronary artery just outside of my aorta.

    The no chest pains puts me in a category of being an anomaly. Therefore any time I report to the ER with anything, they do a 12 lead EKG and a troponin test. But the kicker is it is always abnormal and I am kept in for observation for two to three days.

    I only began to have chest pains in the past 2 years and that is due to my severely enlarged heart. And at best it is just a dull ache or a sudden stabbing feeling and I’m only to go to the ER if my low dose of carvedilol and nitro doesn’t stop it. I’ve been in this struggle for 12 and a half years because the test always came back negative.
    Take care,
    Robin

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Robin – you are indeed a rare patient. Your doctors must have been scratching their heads over your “no chest pain” medical mystery – until two years ago.

      You’re a good example of how every heart patient is different, and how, as Mayo Clinic’s Dr. Victor Montori likes to say, ‘the job is not to take care of a patient LIKE you, it’s to take care of YOU!’

      Good luck to you. . . ♥

      Like

  2. Hi again Jill – your mention of the heat and the walking to the car and the driving reminded me of The Spoon Theory by Christine Miserandino (who blogs at ButYouDontLookSick.com

    Do you know it? She compares a handful of coffee spoons to units of basic energy required for each of her daily plans in her typical chronic-illness life, giving up one spoon for each outing. But on some days, she runs out of “spoons” before she runs out of hours in the day. Thus it’s the “one more stressor” that we forget to anticipate which typically does us in!

    I had to laugh at your ‘can’t walk 3 miles a day” story. I once complained similarly to my pain specialist how distressed I was that I just could no longer seem to meet my 10,000 steps/day walking goal anymore like I’d done for years. He just looked at me and said: “Forget 10,000. Start back with 5,000 – and see how it goes!”

    Like

  3. Hi Carolyn,
    I was fortunate that I was diagnosed early as having episodes of atypical angina. My usual mild, on and off, chest pain changed to pain between my shoulder blades with exertion. My cardiologist sent me for an elective cardiac Cath and stented my 80-90% occluded circumflex artery. So no loss of muscle.

    I do have other cardiac muscle issues with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy… but my question for you is a general one.

    Exercise: How can anything that is supposed to be “good for your heart” feel so bad? If the heart is not equipped to replace or grow new muscle why, according to doctors, am I supposed to make my 74-year old diseased heart beat harder and faster on purpose?

    I ask this after spending yesterday forcing myself to walk around a museum, including several flights of stairs “for my health”. I went home and cried because I felt so drained and awful.

    Just because it didn’t cause chest pain, is it really good for me? I feel like I am shortening my life span instead of increasing it!

    Thanks for listening, I love hearing your wise perspective on All Things Heart.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Jill – you did just what you should have done back when your “on-and-off” chest pain turned into shoulder blade pain with exertion, thus getting you checked out before your blockages could get any bigger!

      An interesting 2018 study out of Texas on “sedentary aging” attracted lots of media attention at the time, and may be relevant to your question on exercise making you feel worse, not better. (I wonder if your museum story could also be linked to lack of pacing yesterday?)

      These researchers (all of them sports cardiologists – so arguably a special breed when discussing the need to exercise!) knew that being sedentary can contribute to the heart’s left ventricle (LV) stiffness – a predictor of poor heart health as we age. They found that two years of moderate-to-intense aerobic and resistance training can result in decreased LV stiffness – but only if the exercise regimen starts BEFORE age 65 (“when the heart apparently retains some plasticity and ability to remodel itself”) and it must be moderate-to-intense exercise, 4-5 days/week.

      The study’s lead author Dr. Benjamin Levine concluded: “When we put healthy 70-year-olds through exercise training programs, nothing happened. We could not change the structure of their heart and blood vessels.”

      As the late tennis great Arthur Ashe once wrote: “Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.” This makes sense to me. One of my readers told me about the free online Eccentrics 30-minute Full Body Pain Relief Workout – which I now do every morning. This isn’t of course the same as “moderate-intense aerobic” exercise – but it is really making a difference to my painful arthritis symptoms – and that’s a good thing!

      Take care. . . . ♥

      Like

      1. Thanks Carolyn…. That information on older adults and the cardiac effects of exercise makes a lot of sense to me. Much nicer than saying “Stop beating a dead horse.” LOL
        I always pace myself as I literally have to sit down every 10-20 mins of walking depending on the day.

        I also think, that even though I was walking inside in air conditioning, the extra effects of 86 degrees outside, and just walking to my car and driving in the heat taxes my heart like another 20-30 mins of exercise.

        I said something to one of my docs the other day that made me laugh out loud at myself….. I said, “I just don’t know why I can’t walk 3 miles a day like I did when I was 50.” Maybe because I’m not 50???

        Arthur Ashe Forever!
        Blessings!

        Like

Your opinion matters. What do you think?