Researchers in the U.K. have found that heart attack survivors have a disturbingly high incidence of undiagnosed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Terrifying symptoms, invasive procedures, and a life-altering diagnosis of heart disease can inflict profound psychological stress.
But interestingly, it’s the part about hearing the diagnosis that may actually be the most traumatic for us, regardless of the severity of our heart damage or required medical intervention.
When I was admitted to the Emergency Department because of a heart attack, the cardiologist on call told me:
“I can tell from your T-waves and your other cardiac test results that you have significant heart disease.”
Part of me was so stricken by those words that I seemed physically unable to process anything more he said to me before I was taken directly upstairs from the E.R. to the O.R.
What do you mean, heart disease?
Did he just say “HEART DISEASE”?!?
Hearing this diagnosis was part of what’s known as the disruption stage – the second identifiable stage in models of illness recovery described by researchers like Morse and Johnson in 1991. They found that, in general, most people will progress through four stages when facing a serious illness:
- 1. uncertainty – we try to understand our condition and its severity
- 2. disruption – we realize that we’re affected by a serious disease and may experience high levels of stress
- 3. striving for recovery – we may try to gain control over our illness with the help of personal and outside resources
- 4. restoration of well-being – we attain a new equilibrium as a result of accepting the illness and its consequences
It’s apparently when we hear the diagnosis, during that second stage called disruption, that patients are likely to experience the worst emotional trauma.
At the University of Washington Medical School’s Ethics in Medicine program, med students are taught that patients hearing a serious diagnosis can often recall decades later in exquisite detail how the news of their diagnosis was delivered by their physician, even if they remember little of the actual conversation that followed. Patients also report that physician competence in these situations is critical to establishing trust and reducing anxiety about the future.
Early research on the potential effects of just hearing a medical diagnosis has shown interesting longterm consequences in patients.
For example, the New England Journal of Medicine reported research by Haynes et al back in 1978, observing that Canadian steel mill workers who were found to have high blood pressure through routine workplace screening had increased absenteeism from work that persisted for at least four years after being diagnosed.
Subsequent research published in the American Journal of Public Health found that some patients, after being told that their blood pressure is too high, perceive their overall health to be worse and report more depressive symptoms and lower quality of life.
And in a 1995 study from the Journal of Human Hypertension, even the close relatives of patients with high blood pressure seemed to be adversely affected by that diagnosis.
Being diagnosed is also what Dr. Hans Selye (the Canadian physiologist whose stress studies guide the modern era) called resistance, which follows the original shock as we try to get our brains wrapped around what’s just happened to us. His explanation of this second stage:
“Now the person is on high gain, accustomed to the increased flow of adrenaline, consciously appraising what has previously been grasped automatically. For example, at this point the person knows that he/she is a victim, although the person may also be thinking: ‘This can’t be happening to me!’ But eventually, there is a return to some equilibrium in the body, the mind and the community.
“This may be a time of depression and demoralization. The high-energy condition is gone. There is debris. There is loss. There is pain. Reality sinks in.
“This is also the time when the initial attention fades. A survivor who might have been annoyed by too much attention could now feel abandoned and forgotten.”
Dr. Frank Ochberg is a founding board member of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. He also wrote, for the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma, about this second stage of adaptation to the initial stressor. His observations may sound very familiar to many heart attack survivors. For example:
“Sometimes the responses from others you rely on for support are negative. For example, someone may play down your problems, needs, or pain, or expect you to recover more quickly than is realistic. This is strongly linked to long-term distress in trauma survivors.”
Find out more about Post Traumatic Stress in Not Just For Soldiers Anymore: Post Traumatic Stress After a Heart Attack.
- How we adapt after a heart attack may depend on what we believe this diagnosis means
- A wife’s heart disease teaches her husband a big lesson
- Which one’s right? Eight ways that patients and families can view heart disease
- Six personality coping patterns that influence how you handle heart disease
- Denial and its deadly role in surviving a heart attack
- Surviving the crisis: the first stage of heart attack recovery
- The new country called heart disease
Q: What was your reaction to hearing your own serious medical diagnosis?