Imagine that your daughter is preparing for a ski race. It’s five minutes before the start of the race. You want to give her some meaningful advice. Which one of these two messages are you going to use?
1. “Honey, remember to do XYZ – it will help you avoid falling!”
2. “Honey, remember to do XYZ – it will make you faster and you’ll have more fun!”
Austrian physician Dr. Franz Wiesbauer, writing to his fellow doctors in a Medcrunch article called Why Your Health Message Does Not Work, has asked this question many times. His conclusions?
“Everyone chose answer #2. Why? Because it’s more encouraging. It’s an approach message – and approach goals (like happiness or success) rock!
“Our problem as physicians is that we are constantly sending out avoidance messages to our patients, and these have been proven to be much less effective.”
Researchers in the field of goal-setting theory tell us that the most effective goals are indeed ones that move you toward a particular objective (approach) rather than away from something you’re trying to avoid (avoidance).
The avoidance messages that doctors may give to their patients include:
- “Stop smoking so you won’t develop lung cancer or heart disease!”
- “Lose weight so you won’t get Type 2 diabetes!”
- “Take your daily blood pressure meds so you won’t have a stroke!”
Most well-meaning doctors, Dr. Wiesbauer believes, do try to deliver this kind of sound health advice to their patients, but, based on results, it seems that we patients are just not listening:
“We tell them again, still to no avail. Frustration sets in and we ask ourselves why they come to us in the first place when they won’t do what we tell them to!”
“It’s not that these patients are stupid by any means. Many of them are really smart and successful. Most know the art of setting goals and achieving them.
“So what’s the problem we are facing here? We think it’s because the whole health-communication paradigm is broken.
“Why? Because health itself is a misnomer.”
Dr. Wiesbauer adds that if you ask patients what “health” is, many will come up with responses like “not being sick” or “not being in the hospital” – as if health is merely the absence of disease.
Behavioural scientists have found that avoidance goals (“Do this so you won’t get sick”) are far less effective than approach goals (“Do this so you’ll feel great!)
For example, psychology professors Dr. Andrew Elliot and Dr. Ken Sheldon have pioneered research(1) about these approach and avoidance goals. Their research suggests that framing a goal with an approach message is almost always more successful than framing it as an avoidance message.
They add that avoidance goals are also more likely to be associated with procrastination. And when we pursue avoidance goals (“I’m doing this to avoid something bad happening!”), we are far more likely to experience:
- less satisfaction with progress and more negative feelings about progress with personal goals
- decreased self-esteem, personal control and vitality
- less satisfaction with life
- less competence in relation to goal pursuits
For example, I could head out for a brisk walk today hoping that it might help to prevent another heart attack (which is an avoidance goal), or I could head out for a brisk walk today to enjoy my neighbourhood and the fresh air (an approach goal).
Or I could say NO to triple helpings at the Death by Chocolate buffet because I don’t want to gain weight (avoidance) or I could say NO because I really want to wake up tomorrow morning feeling good about my choices the night before (approach).
As Dr. Wiesbauer says, the average patient’s definition of health as the absence of disease counteracts the medical profession’s preventive health measures.
Reframing a health goal from avoidance to approach is where the concept of wellbeing enters the stage. So Dr. Wiesbauer warns his fellow physicians:
“We have to communicate to our patients the concept of wellbeing or wellness (we think that the word ‘fitness’ has too much of a sporty touch).
“Our personal wellbeing is a continuum between death, disease, health, wellbeing and perfect wellbeing. It is not a dichotomy. Doctors and their patients have to realize that we are not either healthy or diseased. We all have our sets of risk factors and protective factors.
“We are all on a continuum and we have to strive for optimal wellbeing.”
(1) Elliot, A. J. & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171-185.
This post was also originally published on Mind The Gap.
NOTE FROM CAROLYN: A version of this post was originally published here on Heart Sisters in February of 2012. Because I’m starting a new writing project – details soon! – I find myself temporarily with fewer hours in the day when I’m able to craft new blog articles here. I’m hoping that running some updated favourites from the archives of over 630 Heart Sisters posts will keep you informed, inspired and involved each Sunday for a while. And although I’m not able to write as many new blog posts for the time being, I do love reading your comments – so please feel free to leave a response here. Meanwhile, thank you for your amazing support!
- Why you’ll listen to me – but not to your doctor
- How to stare down that plate of chocolate chip cookies
- Is your doctor telling you to “meditate, eat veggies, walk, quit smoking?” If not, why not?
- Too cold to walk today? Take a heart-smart mall walk!
- Long distance running: safe for women’s hearts?
- What overweight women may have in common with drug addicts
- Physical exercise vs the ‘plumber’s pipe’ theory of heart disease treatment
- Public smoking bans mean lower heart attack rates
- Why are heart patients leaving the hospital still smoking?
2Q: How have you turned an avoidance goal into an approach goal?