Words that hurt: which ones should be deleted from medicine – and why?

by Carolyn Thomas   ❤️   Heart Sisters (on Blue Sky)

I love this list. When Johns Hopkins University asked healthcare professionals to weigh in with their own lists of hurtful words that should no longer be used in patient care or medical charting, the responses were brilliant and thoughtful. Dr. Colleen Christmas, who teaches at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, has this to say on why words matter so much to the patients hearing them.

“”Our medical language is filled with negativity and dehumanization.”

Here are some of my favourite examples of widely-used words that healthcare professionals themselves wish would go away – along with the thoughtful reasons these words can hurt patients (with thanks to the JHU Lifelong Learning in Clinical Excellence program):      .

♥ We’ve really got to ditch ‘compliance.’ The paternalistic and judgmental overtones have no place in a time when we’re moving more and more towards shared decision-making.” (Leslie Ordal, MSc, Genetic Counselor, Toronto, Canada)  See also:  First, there was compliance. Then, adherence. Now, concordance!

♥ I would delete ‘poor historian’ – there’s a always a history to be elicited if we persist. Stories reveal so much about a patient.” (Sam Kant, MD, University of Maryland Medical Center)

♥ And what about ‘difficult patient’ and ‘uncooperative with the history’ – I was taught to say, “I was unable to win the patient’s cooperation,” shifting the responsibility to me as the physician instead of blaming the patient. (Margaret Chisolm, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)  See also: When you fear being labelled a “difficult” patient

♥ It’s always upsetting when the reference is made that a patient with a life-limiting illness ‘failed” treatment – like one can somehow study and pass? (Elizabeth Dougherty, MSW, Burlington, Ontario)

♥ I’m not a fan of patient complains of…It’s very negative. Replace it with ‘patient concerns’ or “presenting symptoms.” (Anisha Gupta, Dentist, UK)

♥ Replace instruct patient with ‘ask patient’ (J. John, Healthcare Agent of Change, Boston, Massachusetts)

♥ Replace patient refused’ with ‘patient declined.’ The word refused carries an unfair undertone. (Shoba Stack, MD, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington)

♥ ‘Uncooperative’ – usually patients are unable to participate due to acute illness or confusion. (Eileen Barrett, MD, MPH, University of New Mexico School of Medicine)  See also: When patients worry about being judged

♥ “Never, ever, ever, ever refer to a person as a disease, a body part, or an inanimate object. Ever.” (Colleen Christmas, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine).  CAROLYN’S EXAMPLE:  I overheard the Emergency Department staff repeatedly referring to me as the “MI in Bed 8”  (and yes, Emerg docs, I know that you’re too busy to develop a meaningful relationship with each cardiac patient, but I didn’t know at the time that MI meant “heart attack”, and my own reaction hit only when I realized that I was the person in Bed 8 (“so they had all been talking about ME!”)

♥  I would eliminate all words that we would not say with our patient listening. (Stuart Ray, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)   See also:  When doctors use words that hurt

♥ Delete ‘patient claims that…’  –  This makes it sound like we don’t believe our patient. (Amita Sudhir, MD, Charlottesville, Virginia)  See also:  Must women bring an advocate along so doctors will believe us?

♥ I would delete the use of ‘case when referring to a patient. It turns a person into an object, and can insidiously foster thinking “thing”, not “person.”  (Randy Barker, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

♥ ‘Frequent flyershould NEVER be used, except in relationship to an airline program.” (Shmuel Shoham, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

♥ And the following examples are from Colleen Christmas, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

♥ Remove the words ‘clinician’ and ‘providerand replace with the more accurate titles, ‘doctor’, ‘nurse practitioner’, etc.  I think it is deceptive to patients who believe they are coming to see a physician, but instead see the physician assistant,  and it blurs the lines of role definitions in a dangerous way.”

♥ Replacethe patient’ with the person’s name as he or she would prefer to be addressed.

♥ Replace ‘denieswith ‘doesn’t have.’

♥ Replace ‘history or present illness‘ with ‘story’ or ‘experiences’;  replace “social history” with “description of person’s life.

♥ Regular readers will already know what I think of the worst example – that dreadful (and cruel) name ‘heart FAILURE’ which I’ve written about several times – including my Editorial in the British Medical Journal  called Heart Failure: It’s Time to Finally Change the F-Word

Finally, even some cardiologists are now agreeing with that sentiment, including Dr. Lynne Warner Stevenson. She’s just one of the prominent cardiologists among a growing movement calling an end to that word “failure” (and she also has some replacement name suggestions that don’t hurt patients). In 2017, here’s how Dr. Stevenson (then at Harvard, now Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt) urged her audience to change the name “heart FAILURE” at the fourth World Congress on Acute Heart Failure in Paris:

“We need to call it something else!  Words are hugely powerful, and heart failure’s name dooms any progress against the disease. Efforts to prevent, diagnose and treat the disease would go better if we could only jettison that unfortunate word ‘failure,’ its hard-wired albatross.”

Some physicians insist that changing the widely-used name of any medical condition simply can’t be done. One American cardiologist, for example, told me “We can’t change the name, because it’s in our billing codes.”

Another cardiologist further explained to me that a name change was impossible because “we’d also then have to change the names of our clinics, our journals and our societies.”  Yes, Doctor – that’s precisely what would happen – as has happened in other clinics, journals and societies long before now – when those names were found to be no longer appropriate.

You may be surprised to learn that a number of medical conditions have started off with a name that was later changed to something more appropriate. Consider these examples:

  • Until 1982, HIV/AIDS was known as GRID (short for Gay-Related Immune Deficiency, even though about half of the people identified with the syndrome were not gay)
  • Physicians once called people who were developmentally or cognitively delayed mentally retarded (which itself had been a replacement descriptor for the previous century’s use of imbecile and moron).
  • Stroke was once known as apoplexy.
  • Tuberculosis used to be called consumption

My first exposure to just how hurtful the name ‘heart FAILURE’ can actually be was a description from one of my Heart Sisters  readers about her own traumatic response to hearing “You have heart FAILURE”  tripping lightly from the lips of her physician: 

“The doctor kept on talking but I couldn’t seem to understand another word after I heard ‘heart FAILURE’. I honestly felt like I was going to pass out or vomit, or both.  Failing? My heart is failing?!  I left his office and then very slowly I walked out to the parking lot, but I was too afraid to get into my car and drive home. How could I possibly live if my heart was failing? I truly expected to drop dead at any moment.”

.

 Read more about why the name heart FAILURE’  must be changed:

♥ Is it finally time to change the name ‘heart FAILURE’?

Two ways to portray heart failure. One of them works

♥  Chronic heart failure: the true heartache of living with “FAILURE”

Would you drive your car if its brakes were “failing”?

Heart FAILURE vs. heart FUNCTION

♥  A patient, a caregiver and a cardiologist walk into a bar

♥ 

Q:  What hurtful words in medicine would you like to see thrown out?

NOTE FROM CAROLYN:  I wrote more about why words matter in medicine in my book, A Woman’s Guide to Living with Heart Disease  (Johns Hopkins University Press).  You can ask for it at your local library or bookshop (please support your favourite independent neighbourhood booksellers, or order it online (paperback, hardcover or e-book) at Amazon – or order it directly from my publisher, Johns Hopkins University Press (use their code HTWN to save 30% off the list price).

3 thoughts on “Words that hurt: which ones should be deleted from medicine – and why?

  1. This list is eye-opening, Carolyn. The examples of “compliance,” “poor historian,” and especially your own experience with “the MI in Bed 8” truly illustrate the dehumanization that can occur through careless language.

    The suggestion to replace “patient complains of” with “patient concerns” is such a simple yet powerful shift. It’s clear that a conscious effort to use more empathetic and respectful language is long overdue in healthcare.

    Marie

    Like

    1. Hello Marie – You’re so right: all it takes is a conscious effort, but most of the examples offered by healthcare professionals themselves are commonly used because “This is the way we’ve always done it!” These are arguably examples of UNconscious hurtful words. I’ve written about how that excuse often unravels when doctors become patients (these are the docs who are so stunned by the lack of “empathetic and respectful language” that they sometimes are compelled to write books about this “new” reality!)

      Dr. Itzhak Brook‘s book “My Voice“, for example, is his memoir of surviving throat cancer, in which he tells this horror story:

      “The tracheotomy tube the doctor wanted to place back was still dirty, and when I asked him to clean it better, he abrasively responded: ‘We call the shots here!’ and left my room…”

      Until I read those words, I’d always assumed that if a doctor was the patient, hospital staff would offer preferential treatment as colleagues, but maybe not always so.

      Take care. . .❤️

      Like

Your opinion matters. What do you think?